New Site Location

The site is migrating to This Location. The domain should be pointed and become automatic within a day or two. See you there.

NEW BOOK DUE OUT SOON

For fans of Reich of the Black Sun and The SS Brotherhood of the Bell, my new book, Secrets of the Unified Field: The Philadelphia Experiment, The Nazi Bell, and the Discarded Theory will be out soon from Adventures Unlimited Press, which is taking pre-orders now along with amazon.com.
This book re-opens and thoroughly reviews the Varo Annotated Edition, makes some very odd connections - which even readers of The Cosmic War, Reich of the Black Sun, and The SS Brotherhood of the Bell will find quite intriguing - and explores the crucial role of the idea of torsion, the work of Gabriel Kron, and the various hyper-dimensional unified field theories of the 1920s and 1930s as analytical tools for interpreting these two crucial World War Two black projects.
For the Philadelphia Experiment afficionado, actual scientific experimentation in support of the plausibility of the story is explored in detail. And for followers of the Nazi Bell story, wait until you read the recently uncovered National Archives documents included in the final chapter....it seems the U.S.A. mounted a minor invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1946!! And wait until you read what their "cover story" was, and what the Czech government maintained was actually the purpose of the raid!
Don't miss this one!

RICHARD HOAGLAND'S "DARK MISSION" GAINS GROUND

For those who've been following the fascinating work of Richard Hoagland through the years, run, don't walk (if you haven't already done so) to your nearest bookstore and get a copy of his newest book Dark Mission: The Secret History of NASA. This is quite a read, and here's why:
I first began to follow Hoagland's work after hearing him on Larry King's old overnight radio show, long before Art Bell came along, and shortly after Mr. Hoagland's first book, The Monuments of Mars had just been printed in its first edition (it's now in its fifth edition and umpteenth printing). I have followed Mr. Hoagland's work ever since. And as anyone knows who has been following it, there is a veritable mountain of data, predictions, papers, photographs and reams of extended analysis on his website (www.enterprisemission.com).
This is where Dark Mission in part fills a much-needed gap, for it in part constitutes a review of his involvement and interest in the anomalies not of Mars, but of our nearest celestial neighbor, the Moon. But the book is also much more than that. It is a thorough review of how he came to hold the hypothesis that there are in fact two space programs, NASA's rather overt and by any account rickety obsolescent one, and a much more secret one. Dark Mission thus gives us what has been needed for some time, a review of this hypothesis and how he came to hold it. But it goes further: it reviews Mr. Hoagland's case that NASA itself was and is beholden to a cabal whose esoteric and occult interests have actually determined mission parameters to some extent, up to, and including, the lunar landings themselves. So much of this book corroborates and confirms the similar conclusions I reached in my own book The SS Brotherhood of the Bell that the two dovetail and confirm each other quite nicely. In fact, the more so, as Mr. Hoagland reaches his conclusions via a slightly different route. In yet another strange corroboration, Mr. Hoagland and co-author Mike Bara came to the conclusion that President Kennedy's assassination was in part motivated by His desire to initiate a cooperative space effort with the Soviet Union. For the threatened and hidden power interests inside of NASA, which according to Hoagland and Bara, included Magicians, Masons, and Nazis - all thoroughly documented in the book - this was too much. The President had to go.
Dark Mission's importance to the growing literature of government suppression of alternative science and technologies cannot be lightly dismissed by anyone with an open mind. In fact, the most interesting thing about the book is the response it has had. Of course, there are the usual silences from America's so-called "free press", and the usual attempts to discredit Mr. Hoagland or Mr. Bara or their associates who have provided data and assistance. These have been so lame and inept that no further comment is needed here, but for the reader who wishes to follow the story, they can read of some of these attacks on Mr. Bara's Dark Mission blog site.
The stupidity and lameness of these attempts has been highlighted in very dramatic fashion by a heavy Russian media attention from the four major networks in Russia, as well as by a sustained interest in Russia's print media. And notwithstanding our own so-called media's mandated disinterest in the work, it has nonetheless climbed to the top twenty of the New York Times non-fiction bestseller list. If you want to know why all these things have happened, if you want to know why Japan has a three ton satellite orbiting the Moon and mapping it, or why China, Russia, and India, in addition to the United States, have regained a sudden interest in returning men to the Moon, if you want to know why the American Press has scarcely mentioned the book inspite of its position on the New York Times Bestseller list, if you want to know why the Russian media has a sustained interest in his work, and if you haven't yet read Dark Mission, then run, don't walk, to your nearest bookstore, and buy, and read, and absorb the profound implications of Dark Mission: The Secret History of NASA.

ANNOUNCEMENTS AND NEWS

Announcements:

November has been a busy month! For those who are interested in hearing me talk about the subjects in my books, I just finished recording an extended series of intervies on The Byte Show (www.thebyteshow.com). Additionally I had appearances on Erskine overnight (he was really pumped for the interview too!), The Edge, and Red Ice Creations from Sweden.

And....just yesterday I taped an interview with Whitley Strieber and a subscribers' interviewm with William Henry. I don't know when these shows will be aired, so be sure to check out Whitley's Dreamland site for information, as Whitley and I had a very interesting, and I thought, thought provoking discussion.

News:

My publisher informs me that my new book Secrets of the Unified Field: The Philadelphia Experiment, the Nazi Bell, and the Discarded Theory should be out sometime in the spring...
I am writing a book right now, and this should be finished sometime around the end of December, and possibly out next fall....and you know better than to ask what it's about yet! After that project I have yet another lurking in the wings, so, as they say, stay tuned...

And finally, let me extend to everyone my best wishes for a very Merry Christmas season and Happy New Year.

NEW BOOKS

The Cosmic War: Interplanetary Warfare, Modern Physics, and Ancient Texts is now available at Adventures Unlimited Press, 1-800-718-4514, or at your local Barnes and Nobles, or Borders' bookstores.

My new book Secrets of the Unified Field: The Philadelphia Experiment, the Nazi Bell, and the Discarded Theory will be out next spring.

BE SURE TO CATCH JOSEPH"S UPCOMING INTERVIEWS

Hello again folks. Just wanted to update you on my upcoming interviews:

Monday, Oct 29, 2007, 11 PM EST The Richard Syrett Show in Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Tuesday, Oct 30, 2007, 12-2PM EST The Truth Hertz Show with Charles Giuliani
Saturday, Nov 3, 2007-Sunday Nov 4, Erskine Overnight
Sunday, Nov 4, 2007, 5PM EST King Well's Radio Show
Sat Nov 10 7-9PM CST The Edge Radio Show
Saturday Dec 1, Whitley Strieber's Dreamland

In addition, be sure to catch my extended interviews with GeorgeAnn Hughes on The Byte Show, at www.thebyteshow.com.

NEW BOOKS UPDATE

Hello again everyone. Just an update on the new books. The Cosmic War should be out sometime this month or October of 2007. Also look for a new book out next spring, sort of a sequel to The SS Brotherhood of the Bell. Sorry, can't reveal the title or exact nature of the subject right now, but I'm confident people who enjoyed that book will enjoy the new information it contains. Both books will be published by Adventures Unlimited Press.

SOME (POSSIBLY DISORGANIZED) THOUGHTS ON DR GREER'S LATEST MISSIVE

Dr. Steven Greer(MD) of the Disclosure Project is at it again in the latest issue of Nexus magazine (Vol 14, No 5, Sept-Oct 2007), with his latest in the series "Understanding the Reasons Behind UFO Secrecy." This time I'm afraid I must rather firmly part company with Dr. Greer, and I hope - lack of sleep, and the problems of disorganized thoughts associated with unpacking after a move notwithstanding - to make my reasons for doing so more or less clear.
The central thesis of Greer's article is reached on p. 58 of the magazine: "Continued secrecy on the UFO subject must be related, then, to ongoing anxiety related to the essential power dynamics of the world and how such a disclosure would impact these. That is, the knowledge related to the UFO/ET phenomenon must have such great potential for changing the status quo that its continued suppression is deemed essential at all costs." Dr. Greer then pinpoints the technological and scientific basis for these concerns in the next paragraph: "Going back to the early 1950s, we have found that the basic technology and physics behind these ET spacecraft were discovered through very intensive reverse-engineering projects. It was precisely at this point that the decision was made (sic) to increase the secrecy to an unprecedented level."
And the reason for this concern over the technology and physics that the UFO-ET phenomenon generated? Simple: "The basic physics behind the energy generation and propulsion systems was such that these systems could easily replace all existing energy generation and propulsion systems on the Earth - and with them, the entire geopolitical and economic order."(p. 58, emphasis added) This is a reasonable argument, and indeed, is one I have made myself in my various books.
But it is precisely here that Dr. Greer's analysis begins to break down, I believe, for he then indicates why he believes the disclosure of such physics and technology would cause major geopolitical and economic upheaval: "The inescapable fact is this: the disclosure of the ET presence would bring with it the certain release of these technologies - and that release would sweep away the entire technological infrastructure of the entire planet. The changes would be immense - and sudden."(p. 58, emphasis added.) There are, to my mind, two fallacies here, one logical, and the other analytical.
As to the logical fallacy, there is no necessary logical reason why disclosure of "the ET presence" should logically entail the disclosure of ET's physics and technology. To be sure, such a disclosure of the former might entail the probable disclosure of the latter. But if this is the case, Dr. Greer has provided no sufficient rationalization for why it should be so. He has merely asserted his belief that it is so. It may, indeed, be a reasonable belief, but Dr. Greer has failed to argue the case why disclosure of the one would lead ineluctably to the revelation of the other. Indeed, a case could be made that with his putative secret group's iron grip on UFO secrecy and compartmentalization of its projects, its grip would most likely extend to the media of information dissemination, and thus a limited disclosure of the "ET presence" is theoretically possible without a disclosure of the implied technology and physics. In other words, his "ET Disclosure" Faith is showing the signs of serious internal contradictions.
But this brings us to the second fallacy, the analytical fallacy, and to what I believe is the more serious problem in his quasi-religious faith in "the ET presence": the assumption that the disclosure of "ET technology", or, for that matter, of any exotic energy technology, whether ET or not, would be necessarily sudden and therefore bound to cause massive geopolitical and economic instability. Here again, Dr. Greer has simply asserted a position without argumentation. To be sure, a case could be argued that disclosure of such technologies would be sudden, and from that position, a further case could be argued that such sudden disclosure would be geopolitically and economically deleterious. However, that is precisely the point: such cases would have to be argued, and this, quite simply, Dr. Greer has failed to do.
It does not logically or automatically follow that disclosure of the physics and technology of "ET" would be necessarily sudden, nor, even if it were, that it would necessarily negatively impact the world geopolitically or economically. After all, the introduction of the automobile, the telephone, the airplane, the computer, were all relatively "sudden", but it took some time before these technologies became available to a wide enough segment of the world's population to impact its geopolitics, cultural habits, and economies.
Dr. Greer makes this leap of logic evident in the almost utopian descriptions of what such disclosure, in his opinion, would do to the world's culture and economies; "These decentralized, nonpolluting technologies will change that permanently. Even the deserts will bloom..." (p. 59). And thus, the "ET Presence" and its associated technologies and physics position themselves in Dr. Greer's presentation like some latter-day Isaiah, promising peace, prosperity, and above all, local sovereignties on the newly blooming and once-arid deserts of globalism's apocalypse.
But again, it is bald assertion, or, as is now evident, fiath in a post-apocalyptic energy utopia, and not an argued case, that has led to this statement. It is a pronouncement of faith, an article in what increasingly looks like an "ET-Disclosure Creed." Consider, how does it necessarily follow that free-energy technologies will lead to decentralization? Or be non-polluting? If, as Dr Greer says, "one must consider what will happen when every village in India (or Africa of South America or China) has devices that can generate large amounts of power without pollution and without spending huge sums of energy on fuel", then one must also consider the implications that the possession of such energy sources on such a localized basis could lead to a condition where such villages would have the ability to weaponize such energy. This would be the equivalent of making each village a thermonuclear superpower, able to rain global destruction and complete annihilation on any of its enemies, anywhere in the world. And note too the fallacy implied both in Dr. Greer's statement of his position, and in my own response to it. Dr. Greer seems to imply that the disclosure of the ET presence and its associated technologies will lead almost immediately - recall his use of the word "sudden" above - to this state of affairs. It never crosses his mind, and therefore never gets set down in the hard and fast words of his article, that this state of affairs may arrive only after some decades or even centuries of progress in the basic physics and technological applications. Again, he has not argued his case, but merely asserted it. Indeed, on reflection, it would seem that Dr. Greer describes a state of affairs more or less at the end stage of a technological development, rather than at its beginning, when a new science and its associated technologies have been refined, developed, and widely dispersed throughout a society. The same, therefore, holds true of my response concerning weaponization.
Again, this is without argumentation. Would such technologies necessarily be cheap enough for villages in South Africa or India or China even to afford? We do not know, for Dr. Greer has not, in this article at least, argued his case.
And finally, let us grant, for the sake of that all-important missing argumentation, all of Dr. Greer's implied postulates, namely:
1) that ET exists ;
2) that ET is the source of UFOs and their implied exotic technologies and physics; and,
3) that this implied technology and physics would upset the geopolitical and economic status quo, a point on which Dr. Greer and I are not disagreed, though for very different reasons.
But from all this it does not necessarily or logically follow that the "hidden, secretive global cabal" that controls this technology does not wish to disclose it because it would be a cheap technology affordable by such third world villages. Indeed, it does not even logically follow that this elite could not contrive means and methods for maintaining more or less a monopolistic hold on it, and selling it to the world accordingly, as it has done with other technologies in the past.
If all these musings be true in whole or in part, then Dr. Greer's case for the "reasons" behind UFO secrecy, as elaborated - not argued - in this most recent missive, collapse. This means that there must be reasons that Dr Greer as yet has either not guessed at, or that he wishes to avoid admitting or mentioning, and, alas, in my opinion it is the latter. If one grant, for the sake of argument once again, that Dr. Greer's postulates, as generally summarized above, are true, then it follows inevitably as a product of the very same science and technology that a means would exist for controlling such physics and energy for destructive purposes. This energy potential, as I have repeatedly argued, explored, outlined, surveyed and documented in my books, has a weaponization potential that would make a hydrogen bomb look like a kitchen match. And if it be true that it would be CHEAP and easy to disseminate to Third World villages, then Greer's secretive UFO-technology-suppression cabal would have ample, reasonable, and moreover ethical reasons for maintaining their secrecy, for the release of that technologywould create a proliferation nightmare for the globalist-powers-that-be. Their own self-survival would be imperiled, as Dr. Greer so clearly avers, but not for the reasons - or rather - unargued assertions - that he advances.
And this brings us to his last two, and most implortant, implied hypotheses, hypotheses running implicitly throughout his Nexus magazine series: 1) ET exists; and 2) ET is peaceful and benign. As to the first of these, the fact remains that in no instance of an alleged technological description of an allegedly recovered piece of "ET" technology, is that technology sufficiently exotic enough to compel to the conclusion of its "ET" origins. Indeed, as I have tried to show in my books Reich of the Black Sun and SS Brotherhood of the Bell, the most extensive documented descriptions of allegedly ET devices are the dubious MAJIC-12 documents, which, when examined closely as to the nature of their internal evidence and descriptions of technology, fall far short of describing a physics sufficient to compel to the conclusion of their interstellar origins. Exotic they are, to be sure, but not exotic enough to be self-evidently "extra-terrestrial." As to the second implied postulate that "ET is peaceful and benign", it should be plainly obvious to anyone familiar with the UFOlogy field, that this is a conclusion hotly debated within those circles, and thus once again not self-evident nor compulsive to one or another conclusion.
No, with this most recent missive, I had more the impression of reading a sermon preached to the faithful ET believer, one lacking in argumentation, and even lacking in Dr. Greer's customary sharing of anecdotes from anonymous sources or highly placed individuals.
As such, it isn't even a good sermon.

DR GREER GETS IT....SORT OF....

As you know, I've been following the articles written by Steven Greer, M.D. in Nexus magazine. The most recent installment, in volume 14, No. 2 (March-April 2007, pp. 55-61) contains some interesting allegations and observations.
At the top of this list of allegations is Greer's observation that many "alien abductions" appear to be centered around or near military bases(p. 55), an observation that I also heard from author and UFOlogist Whitley Strieber when I was a guest on his Dreamland radio show last fall. Personally, I am inclined to accept Greer's contention that at least some "abduction" cases are staged events hosted by the military, often on victims who themselves have some connection to the military. It is Greer's contention that the purpose of these abductions is "to do exactly what Wernher Von Braun warned about: to prepare people for an eventual false threat from outer space that would 'unite the world' around a new level of centralised military-industrial-economic power." (p. 55) Greer refers, of course, to the affadavit of Von Braun associate, Dr. Carol Rosin, which is one of the testimonies contained in his Disclosure project, and which has formed a central part of my two books on Nazi secret weapons, Reich of the Black Sun and The SS Brotherhood of the Bell. More about that subject in a moment.
In any case, the implications of Greer's observation-cum-allegation is clear: the militaries of the world's great powers - with the USA presumably leading the pack - are conducting psychological operations of truly long-range nature, considering that the abduction phenomenon has been around since at least the end of World War Two, in its "contactee" variant.
Greer maintains further that these programs are conducted in conjunction with secret black projects that have been around"from the turn of the last century and World War I!"(p. 56) And of course he mentions the usual suspects in this regard: Tesla, Thomas Townsend Brown, and even has a brief mention of Faraday! (p. 56) Those who would attempt to blow the lid off this secretive development of "UFO" and related technologies "would have ended up like Jack Kennedy, or like Lord Mountbatten....like Marilyn Monroe and Mary Meyer and all those other people who were killed for not going along with the secrecy." Greer even adds former CIA director Bill Colby to this list, a fact that casts even more of a shadow on Colby's suspicious death.(p. 56)
With these observations, again, I am inclined to agree. After all, one of the themes of my book The SS Brotherhood of the Bell is that there is a pervasive Nazi presence in the background of the JFK assassination, and that one motivation for their involvement in that conspiracy was to protect secret Nazi technology that continued to be developed within the black projects briefs of the US military after the war, and developed quasi-independently of US control at that. Greer is skating very close here, to what I believe to be one of the essential cores of this group and its ideology: the Nazis. As Greer himself states towards the end of his article:

"(Then) there's an even smaller number who understand that the strings being pulled behind the scenes are from a transnational, fascist-oriented group, not unlike the Thules who were behind the emergence of Hitler. What they couldn't do overtly during the Third Reich, they have done covertly. And through Operation Paperclip, we brought them into the United States and seeded the aerospace inducstry and the CIA.
"So, the global socialist-fascist effort that did not take hold overtly in World War II has been going on, at a subterranean level, since then. We are about to see its unveiling in a larger way, as attempts to consolidate power in the world around such ase philosophy and around such a structure become consummated."(p. 59)

This is as close as I have ever heard anyone come to an admission that the Nazis - or rather, their "secret backers" in the various secret societies of pre-War Germany - were but cats' paws in a much larger game, and that they were central and core components in the post-war structure of international covert operations, black projects, and UFOlogy.
In other words, Dr. Greer gets it.
He knows, or rather, senses that something changed with World War Two and the "defeat" of the Nazis; that they merely went covert once again, and became an international rogue group, a core component of his international fascist-socialist rogue group.
But here is where I think Greer falls somewhat short. The underlying theme running throughout Greer's Nexus articles is that space should not be weaponized, and that the "ETs" who have been visiting us are really peaceful and not a threat. However, what military, of whatever power, would honestly behave in this fashion? Let's be reasonable here: if there is an "ET" aspect to UFOs, then it would be the height of irrationality for the militaries of the world's great powers not to assume a "worse case scenario" posture and attempt to provide for some defense of their country and the wider world at large. They would be remiss in their briefs if they did so. In addition to this, Greer is forgetting the step immediately prior to the "ET" threat in Von Braun's "case for space weaponization," mentioned in Carol Rosin's affidavit, and that step is that before the ET threat, there will be the "asteroid threat." In other words, to save the earth from catastrophic impacts, space will have to be weaponized. One should note the implication here, for the deployment of weapons of sufficient power to destroy an asteroid, or at least "nudge it off course" assumes that weapons of extraordinary power and sophistication already exist. And that of course implies the existence of weapons able to be deployed offensively against the surface of the earth as well. Once again, if this threat is real, the great powers' militaries would be remiss in their brief not to prepare against such an eventuality.
In this regard it is interesting to note the recent increase of programs on the Discovery and History channels dealing with ancient and modern asteroid impacts and their presumed deadly effects on the environment of the Earth.
But in any case, it is utterly irrelevant to the case whether or not "ET's" intentions are hostile or not, since the world's militaries will operate under the assumptions of "the worst case scenario" that they are a threat, since the same holds true for asteroids, which obviously cannot be construed as having any "intention" of hostility or not.
There is a second problem with Greer's allegations, one with which I am sure he is familiar since he has already admitted the existence of a "technologies suppression" effort going back at least as far as Tesla, if not much father...perhaps even to Farraday! But in order to suppress such abberant technologies, one must also suppress the physics theories and observations on which they are based. One must, in other words, create a "public consumption" physics, of breathtaking beauty and mathematical seductiveness, a physics that can only lead to various dead ends, while secretly and covertly developing a whole different paradigm of physics.
I believe this is what in fact has happened, for there are little indicators here and there that this is the case, from Heaviside's editting of Maxwell's original electromagnetic equations from quaternion geometry to linear algebra, thus editting out of his equations the scalar component, to careful suppression within histories of physics of the implications of Georges Sagnac's rotational version of the Michelson-Morley experiment, to the careful suppression of observations that contradict the predictions of General Relativity, and the almost "divine" status accorded to that theory within normal physics pedagogy, a status equalled elsewhere in science only by the theory of evolution.
Which leads us to why Greer gets it, "sort of." Greer implies that it was the threat that JFK, Lord Mountbatten, Mary Meyer, Marilyn Monroe and others posed to the secretive development of alternative technologies that was the motivation for their murders or "death by suspicious causes" in some cases. But it is not so. The real problem for such a covert program of suppressed technologies and physics is rather different, for once such a technology is let out of the bag, it would only be a matter of time before some enterprising and brilliant mind deciphered the physics paradigm that made it work. Once that paradigm becomes widely known, the jig is up for Greer's covert rogue group, for the proliferation problem will then become a nightmare for it, allowing not only access to more efficient energy, but also access to weapons that would make a hydrogen bomb look like a kitchen match, an access more easily acquired too, since such weapons are much less costly and complex to build.
Might, then, the "suppression" group's motivations also be in part "altruistic", to protect the world from a future where a Michael Corleone, or an Adolf Hitler or Osama bin Laden have relatively easy access to such instruments of power?
Think about it...